Monday, June 29, 2009

The doctor is in

Dr. McGill is a very smart man. All of these exercises are recommended by me. Stiring the pot can be extrapolated to the barbell in a corner for more real life motor neural integration.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/core-myths/?em

Is Your Ab Workout Hurting Your Back?

Phys Ed
core exerciseGetty Images

The genesis of much of the ab work we do these days probably lies in the work done in an Australian physiotherapy lab during the mid-1990s. Researchers there, hoping to elucidate the underlying cause of back pain, attached electrodes to people’s midsections and directed them to rapidly raise and lower their arms, like the alarmist robot in “Lost in Space.”

In those with healthy backs, the scientists found, a deep abdominal muscle tensed several milliseconds before the arms rose. The brain apparently alerted the muscle, the transversus abdominis, to brace the spine in advance of movement. In those with back pain, however, the transversus abdominis didn’t fire early. The spine wasn’t ready for the flailing. It wobbled and ached. Perhaps, the researchers theorized, increasing abdominal strength could ease back pain. The lab worked with patients in pain to isolate and strengthen that particular deep muscle, in part by sucking in their guts during exercises. The results, though mixed, showed some promise against sore backs.

From that highly technical foray into rehabilitative medicine, a booming industry of fitness classes was born. “The idea leaked” into gyms and Pilates classes that core health was “all about the transversus abdominis,” Thomas Nesser, an associate professor of physical education at Indiana State University who has studied core fitness, told me recently. Personal trainers began directing clients to pull in their belly buttons during crunches on Swiss balls or to press their backs against the floor during sit-ups, deeply hollowing their stomachs, then curl up one spinal segment at a time. “People are now spending hours trying to strengthen” their deep ab muscles, Nesser said.

But there’s growing dissent among sports scientists about whether all of this attention to the deep abdominal muscles actually gives you a more powerful core and a stronger back and whether it’s even safe. A provocative article published in the The British Journal of Sports Medicine last year asserted that some of the key findings from the first Australian study of back pain might be wrong. Moreover, even if they were true for some people in pain, the results might not apply to the generally healthy and fit, whose trunk muscles weren’t misfiring in the first place.

“There’s so much mythology out there about the core,” maintains Stuart McGill, a highly regarded professor of spine biomechanics at the University of Waterloo in Canada and a back-pain clinician who has been crusading against ab exercises that require hollowing your belly. “The idea has reached trainers and through them the public that the core means only the abs. There’s no science behind that idea.” (McGill’s website is backfitpro.com.)

The “core” remains a somewhat nebulous concept; but most researchers consider it the corset of muscles and connective tissue that encircle and hold the spine in place. If your core is stable, your spine remains upright while your body swivels around it. But, McGill says, the muscles forming the core must be balanced to allow the spine to bear large loads. If you concentrate on strengthening only one set of muscles within the core, you can destabilize your spine by pulling it out of alignment. Think of the spine as a fishing rod supported by muscular guy wires. If all of the wires are tensed equally, the rod stays straight. “If you pull the wires closer to the spine,” McGill says, as you do when you pull in your stomach while trying to isolate the transversus abdominis, “what happens?” The rod buckles. So, too, he said, can your spine if you overly focus on the deep abdominal muscles. “In research at our lab,” he went on to say, “the amount of load that the spine can bear without injury was greatly reduced when subjects pulled in their belly buttons” during crunches and other exercises.

Instead, he suggests, a core exercise program should emphasize all of the major muscles that girdle the spine, including but not concentrating on the abs. Side plank (lie on your side and raise your upper body) and the “bird dog” (in which, from all fours, you raise an alternate arm and leg) exercise the important muscles embedded along the back and sides of the core. As for the abdominals, no sit-ups, McGill said; they place devastating loads on the disks. An approved crunch begins with you lying down, one knee bent, and hands positioned beneath your lower back for support. “Do not hollow your stomach or press your back against the floor,” McGill says. Gently lift your head and shoulders, hold briefly and relax back down. These three exercises, done regularly, McGill said, can provide well-rounded, thorough core stability. And they avoid the pitfalls of the all-abs core routine. “I see too many people,” McGill told me with a sigh, “who have six-pack abs and a ruined back.”

Saturday, June 27, 2009

But = Bullshit

I miss working out and being in shape but (bullshit) between the job and the kids, I just don't have time.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Straight Arm Dumbell Row

I think this long forgotten little gem may have fixed my Lat/Serratus problem. Kudos to Christian Thibaudeau over at T-nation. I used to do these all the time as they are great to get you in touch with your Lats.

Another hat tip to Marybeth over at Somaquest for reminding me that its about intention.



Dumbbell row (straight-arm)

This exercise is very good at developing the lats. The objective is to bring the arm up and back while keeping it relatively straight. Really concentrate on your lats while doing this drill; don't use a lot of weight as it's not needed to get the most out of this drill. It's more important to focus on maintaining maximum back tension during every inch of every rep.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

SOCIAL NETWORKS AND HAPPINESS

Surround yourself with "happy people". I think we have all sensed this as true.

SOCIAL NETWORKS AND HAPPINESS

Happiness is a fundamental object of human existence. To the extent that it is synonymous with pleasure, it could even be said to be one of the \"two sovereign masters\" that, Jeremy Bentham argued, govern our lives. The other master, lest we forget, is pain.

Our happiness is determined by a complex set of voluntary and involuntary factors, ranging from our genes to our health to our wealth. Alas, one determinant of our own happiness that has not received the attention it deserves is the happiness of others. Yet we know that emotions can spread over short periods of time from person to person, in a process known as \"emotional contagion.\" If someone smiles at you, it is instinctive to smile back. If your partner or roommate is depressed, it is common for you to become depressed.

But might emotions spread more widely than this in social networks—from person to person to person, and beyond? Might an individual\'s location within a social network influence their future happiness? And might social network processes—by a diverse set of mechanisms—influence happiness not just fleetingly, but also over longer periods of time?

We recently published a paper in the British Medical Journal that addressed these questions. We studied 4,739 people followed from 1983 to 2003 as part of the famous Framingham Heart Study. These individuals were embedded in a larger network of 12,067 people; they had an average of 11 connections to others in the social network (including to friends, family, co-workers, and neighbors); and their happiness was assessed every few years using a standard measure.

We found that social networks have clusters of happy and unhappy people within them that reach out to three degrees of separation. A person\'s happiness is related to the happiness of their friends, their friends\' friends, and their friends\' friends\' friends—that is, to people well beyond their social horizon. We found that happy people tend to be located in the center of their social networks and to be located in large clusters of other happy people. And we found that each additional happy friend increases a person\'s probability of being happy by about 9%. For comparison, having an extra $5,000 in income (in 1984 dollars) increased the probability of being happy by about 2%.

Happiness, in short, is not merely a function of personal experience, but also is a property of groups. Emotions are a collective phenomenon.

To follow up this study, we have also been examining online social networks. Emotional clustering and contagion are so fundamentally rooted in our ancient evolutionary psychology that—we believe—they should carry over to the very modern online world of email, blogs, and social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook.

One of our efforts has involved the examination of a group of 1,700 college students who are interconnected in Facebook. We examined these students\' online profiles. We noted who their friends were and we also studied their photographs.

The photographs were valuable in two ways. First, we coded who appeared in photographs with whom. People who take the trouble to be in the same place, take a photograph together, upload the photograph, and label (\"tag\") it, almost certainly have a closer relationship with one another than the usual \"friends\" people indicate in online social networking sites. In fact, while the average student in our data had over 110 friends on Facebook, they had an average of only six \"picture friends\" (i.e., people close enough that they tagged the student).

Second, we coded whether the students were smiling in their profile photographs, and we mapped the network of students and their picture friends, making note of who was smiling and who was not. In a way, this is the online analogue of the research we did with happiness in the Framingham social network, though smiling is, of course, different than happiness.

The figure below is a map of part of this Facebook network in 2007. It contains 353 students, each represented by a node; each line between two nodes indicates that the connected individuals were tagged in a photo together. Students who are smiling (and who are immediately surrounded by smiling people in their network) are colored yellow. Students who are frowning (and who are immediately surrounded by such serious looks) are colored blue. Shades of green indicate a mix of smiling and non-smiling friends.

Notice how strongly the blue nodes and the yellow nodes cluster together, indicating large-scale structure of smiling in the online network. Moreover, people who do not smile seem to be located more peripherally in the network. In fact, statistical analysis of the network shows that people who smile tend to have more friends (smiling gets you an average of one extra friend, which is pretty good considering that people only have about six close friends). Not only that, but the statistical analyses confirm that those who smile are measurably more central to the network compared to those who do not smile. That is, if you smile, you are less likely to be on the periphery of the online world.

It thus seems to be the case, online as well as offline, that when you smile, the world smiles with you.


[click on image to enlarge]

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Narcissism

I'm always self editing to check for this problem. It all comes back to the question of value. Why do you train? Is it only for the praise of others? Would you continue to train on a desert island? Training for me is a Zen thing. I do it because I love IT.

ThatsFit.ca - Food, Relationships, Health, Fitness and Beauty


Sunday, June 21, 2009

Food, Inc.

So your diabetic, unemployed, have no health insurance and you voted for Bush? Really? He's a guy I could have a beer with. Way to go there fatso.

Julie's Health Club - Where alternative and mainstream health meet | Chicago Tribune | Blog | Blogroll
Food, Inc.: How factory farming affects you

Important food for thought

Multimedia_gallery-image[1] The sobering new documentary Food, Inc. which opens in Chicago on June 19, shows the enormous hidden costs we all pay for eating cheap, factory-farmed food.

Most of us don't think much about how the food on grocery store shelves is produced, what's in it, or the impact it has on our bodies, the planet or the laborers.

And that's exactly how big agribusiness likes it, according to director Robert Kenner, who set out to "lift the veil" on the industrial food process.

Though the film is admittedly one-sided--Monsanto, Tyson, Perdue and Smithfield all declined the filmmakers access and prevented some of their growers from talking on camera--there's enough shocking undercover camera footage to make viewers start asking some important questions, such as "where does our food come from?"

Interviews with intestigative reporters and authors Eric Schlosser, ("Fast Food Nation") and Michael Pollan ("The Omnivore's Dilemma), independent farmers such as Joel Salatin (pictured above) and others, meanwhile, add context and help connect the dots.


But despite the factory-farm scenes, some of the most thought-provoking moments were these statements that were spoken or flashed on the screen. According to the filmmakers:

*

In 1972, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration conducted 50,000 food safety inspections. In 2006, the FDA conducted only 9,164.

*

In 1996 when it introduced Round-Up Ready soybeans, Monsanto controlled only 2 percent of the U.S. soybean market. Now, over 90 percent of soybeans in the U.S. contain Monsanto's patented gene.
*

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an attorney at Monsanto from 1976 to 1979. After his appointment to the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion in a case that helped Monsanto enforce its seed patents.
*

70 percent of processed foods have some genetically modified ingredient. (Genetically modified crops are not labeled in the U.S. even though 90 percent of consumers have said they want labeling.)
*

1 in 3 Americans born after 2000 will contract early onset diabetes; Among minorities, the rate will be 1 in 2.

Listen to: Michael Pollan discuss the film with NPR's Steve Inskeep.

Read: "Why Bother?" by Michael Pollan.

Read: Patrick Goldstein's review in the Los Angeles Times

Read: 10 ways you can change your eating habits.


Saturday, June 20, 2009

TMUSCLE.com | Advice You Don't Want to Hear Vol 2

Mike Robertson: Your Upper Back Strength Sucks

If most people trained their upper back as hard as they should, we\'d have a lot fewer geek physiques and jacked-up shoulders roaming around the local fitness facility.

If you\'re looking for an analogy, upper back is like the leg workout for your upper body. If you\'re serious and pushing yourself, it\'s a damn hard workout.

Think about it like this: Are you always willing to do that extra chin-up? Or to add another five pounds to your chest-supported row? If you\'re like most guys and gals out there, the answer is probably \"no.\"

The cool thing is, when you get serious about your upper back strength, everything seems to get bigger and stronger. Without even trying, you\'re adding mass to your arms. Your squat and your deadlift are suddenly much more stable.

And your bench press? Well, I\'d bet that your bench would really shoot through the roof if you trained your back — the stabilizers of your bench press — as hard as you trained the bench press itself.

If you want to take your back strength and development to the next level, try prioritizing it in your training for several months. Increase the volume. Place a big exercise like chins or chest-supported rows first in your workout. Better yet, place them at the beginning of your workout and at the beginning of your training week.

Get serious about your upper back. You\'ll be amazed at the results.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

SomaQuest

I found this fascinating quote today:



Just as you forget what's in the junk drawer until you need something in there, and rediscover it again, certain aspects of ourselves get "filed away" because of disuse, confusion, or experience. "I'll need this someday," we tell ourselves. It's in a crisis -- where is the allen wrench? Didn't I have a crochet hook? -- that we frantically search for the perfect, simple, and elusive tool that solves our problem. Likewise, the experience of a freely floating shoulder, an easy neck, or a flexible and buoyant spine gets "filed away" after years of sitting still in a school desk or before a computer screen. The gentle and pleasurable movements we experienced as children are "filed away" in our brains, waiting to be rediscovered. When your neck feels tight, you know you should relax or release -- but how do you do that? If you knew how, you'd have done it long ago. This information is in the junk drawer.MaryBeth Smith, SomaQuest, Jun 2009



You should read the whole article.


 


This gets my mental gears rolling. It just a matter of remembering how to move and be pain free. At least it's a start.

TMUSCLE.com | Training Tips From A to Z

Can I get an AMEN!

L is for Let\'s Be Honest, We\'re Wussies

You can always train around an injury.

If you have chronic lower-back pain, you can work on core stability. If you have shoulder impingement, you can cut back on bench presses while adding more horizontal rowing (not to mention the fact you have a lower body that isn\'t affected). Knee pain won\'t stop you from performing glute-ham raises until your ass has its own zip code.

That is, if you really want to train.

Eric Cressey and I have worked with clients who came to us on crutches, in back braces, or with limbs in a cast. We could always find ways to give them a good workout without interfering with their rehab. Sometimes they actually get stronger.

Conversely, there are people who\'ll skip out on a training session because they\'re tired or have a headache. We call them \"wussies.\" Next time you feel like being one, watch this video.

Sunday, June 7, 2009

The Jammer



The Hammer Strength Jammer is an awesome "machine". Having eschewed bench presses and anything that impinges the shoulder, I rediscovered the Jammer at Red's. Now they won't list the price on their web site so you know it's out of this world. Making do one day with what I had, I came up with the old "bar in a corner" stand by. Old school rules.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Bizzaro

http://www.liftgymdesign.com/

The opposite universe. I must say that if i win the lottery this is the home gym for me.

Yes, I am jealous.

How do I work my butt?



If I had a nickle for every time I've heard this question I would be rich. And to avoid the obvious answer "get off of it", Leg curls on a stability ball are an excellent option. Squats, deadlifts, and lunges being the top ones of course. If injury, lack of equipment, or another medical condition prevent those, try these.